beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On February 9, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 17, 2017.
"2016 Highest 4329"
1. Defendant A’s violation of public brokerage and brokerage / [criminal fact] Defendant A is a person who actually runs the “F office” located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E commercial building.
No person may render brokerage services using another person's name or trade name.
A. On May 31, 2014, Defendant A arranged a sales contract for G, buyer’s I 2 Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City I 2nd floor A, and Defendant A provided brokerage services, such as preparing a sales contract using the name and trade name of J by a certified broker, and the F by receiving KRW 7.5 million from G, and KRW 5 million from H, respectively.
B. On August 16, 2014, Defendant A arranged a sales contract for K and buyer’s 106 and 107 Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, and Defendant A provided brokerage services, such as preparing a sales contract using the name and trade name of N of an authorized broker and the name of N of the F, respectively, by receiving KRW 5 million from K as a commission, and one million from L.
2. Defendant B’s aiding and abetting Defendant B’s fraud is the person who was the owner of the P club in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s first and second floors.
Defendant
B around March 13, 2014, the agreement was made to sell A’s right to use the building and operation of the F office of the operation of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “A from the F office to the said F office,” and agreed to sell A a KRW 500 million at the consulting cost with respect to the sale of the building and operation rights of the said Fusea club, thereby including the said consulting cost of KRW 4.3 billion, even though the actual purchase price of the building and operation rights of the said Fusea club was KRW 4.5 billion, the sales price was KRW 4.8 billion, and the sales contract was not actually received from A, but the Defendant B entered that the sales contract was received KRW 500 million under the name of the Defendant B, stating that he was paid the sales contract deposit.