logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고단2965
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2014, at around 22:10, the Defendants, on the grounds that, on the front side of the 'Dcafeteria' in Yangsan City, the 'Dcafeteria' would change tobacco, Defendant A would take the face of the victim by drinking, Defendant B would take the face of the victim over once by drinking, Defendant A would take the face of the victim beyond one time, and Defendant A would inflict an injury on the victim by taking one-time care of about four weeks, such as bad stoves, stoves, bad stoves, stoves, and stoves.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the Defendants and E

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and injury diagnosis report;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor, and the choice of imprisonment with labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of recommendation] is the basic area of category 1 (general injury in April 1 and 6] (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence] all the defendants, the method of violence is harsh, the degree of injury of the victim is not easy, and the damage is not paid in full, and the nature and circumstances are not good.

However, the sentencing materials recorded in the records, such as the fact that all the Defendants have no record of crime more than the suspension of qualification, the fact that there are errors, the fact that part of damage is deemed to have been discharged, shall be determined as ordered.

arrow