logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고단2981
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court on March 4, 2015, and a fine of KRW 1 million for the same crime at the same court on September 5, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a car with B test.

On July 20, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.138% with a blood alcohol concentration around 21:40, and driven the said car along the two-lanes of the two-lanes in front of the city of Jyang-si, Jyang-si, Jyang-gu, Jyangyang-si.

Since the victim C(n, 28 years old) driving SM5 car was under a traffic signal stop at the front of the same lane, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and properly operate the operation and steering gear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting it and received the back portion of the damaged passenger vehicle as the front part of the passenger vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, salt d (n, 28 years old) and the victim E (n, 28 years old) with respect to the c and damaged passenger cars, respectively, for about two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a car in the section of about 500 meters from the front of a restaurant in the mutual influence of the Namyang-gu, Namyang-si to the front of the above 500-meter road, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.138% at the above temporary border.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographs 1.

arrow