logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.01.12 2017나32617
부당이득금반환 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From June 15, 2007, the Plaintiff was the head of G Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “instant association”)’s partnership establishment authorization on August 30, 2007 after the inaugural general meeting for the establishment of the association on June 15, 2007.

B. The Plaintiff was convicted of the following facts constituting the crime

(Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2012Ma846, 2012No646, 2012No646, 2012Do10618, hereinafter “relevant criminal case”) 1) The Plaintiff in violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name from E who opposed to the establishment of the instant association, shall be the land and buildings located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(B) The Plaintiff purchased the ownership of KRW 600 million and entered into a title trust agreement with the J’s son, who is an auditor of the instant association, to complete the registration of ownership transfer under the name of Defendant B, around July 2, 2007, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of a title trustee B around November 2, 2007. (2) The Plaintiff conspired with K, who is a full-time director of the instant association, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of a title trustee, a title trustee. (3) In doing so, the Plaintiff, in collusion with K, who is a part-time director of the instant association, shall conduct the cash settlement of the instant real estate in accordance with the arithmetic average of the values appraised by requesting the two appraisal business entities, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to 176,573,440 won, which is the difference between the arithmetic average and high-priced cash settlement amount. (B) The Plaintiff in collusion with K to liquidate the instant association’s property damage equivalent to the same amount of money, and calculated by requesting the appraisal business entity’s land and property.

arrow