1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The facts [based on recognition] Gap 1 to 16, 20, and 26 certificates (including household numbers) and the purport of the entire pleadings is a company established on December 2, 1996 by making hotel business operation, etc. a target business, and the defendant operates a tourist hotel with the trade name of "H hotel" in the 3, D, E, F, G, and B total six lots of land in the Da, Da, Da, Da, Da, and B.

On June 27, 2012, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor/Do Governor made a decision on urban planning facilities with respect to the size of 102,754 square meters in Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, which is to convert a specific use area into a management plan area, establish a youth training center as an urban planning facility (juvenile training facility), and publicly notify it to the J of the Jeonnam-do. On December 26, 2012, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education was designated as a project implementer according to the determination of the instant urban planning facility of Jeonnam-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education as a project implementer according to the determination of the instant urban planning facility of Jeonnam-do, and approved the division of the instant project, and publicly notified

The Central Land Tribunal's ruling of expropriation (hereinafter referred to as "adjudication of expropriation"): ① (1) the date of adjudication of expropriation - (2) September 26, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "date of adjudication of expropriation") - Land and obstacles in each of the lands and obstacles owned by the Defendant and M indicated in attached Form "land compensation details" (3) the starting date of expropriation - November 19, 2013 - (4) the amount of compensation calculated by calculating the arithmetic mean the arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal business operators, for compensation for each of the land and obstacles in this case: (1) the date of adjudication of expropriation - (2) the date of adjudication of expropriation - the amount appraised by two appraisal business operators increases the amount of compensation for expropriation on the land and obstacles owned by the Defendant.

(1) As the Plaintiff and the Defendant refused to receive compensation under the instant expropriation ruling and the instant objection ruling, on November 13, 2013, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 646,448,030 to the Defendant as compensation for losses, and KRW 244,03,150 to M, respectively, and on March 19, 2014, deposited KRW 646,448,03,150 to the Defendant.