logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.05.31 2017고단809
응급의료에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by persons engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat, or other means, or destroy, damage, or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines, or other instruments for emergency medical services provided by a medical institution, etc.

On January 4, 2017, at the emergency room of the E Hospital located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, and around 23:30 on January 4, 2017, the Defendants: (a) requested Defendant B to request the medical expenses after receiving the medical treatment to change the medical expenses on credit; (b) but, at the emergency department of the emergency department, the Defendants called “I will not extend this time. I do not do so.” (c) when the emergency doctor F on duty and the emergency medical technician G provided 6 patients under the name of the non-patient.

equal to bitch bitch.

C. Hark, etc. was expressed in the manner of “sark.”

As a result, Defendant A her obsesses with “grings, chewings,” etc. in Defendant B’s neighborhood, and even when Defendant A received a request from the security personnel H for early use at an emergency room at the patient’s atmosphere, Defendant A did not comply with the request even though he/she received a request from the security personnel H, and took a bath for about 30 minutes to emergency medical workers and emergency patients.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the treatment of emergency patients by the employees of emergency medical services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of I and G;

1. Investigation report (Analysis of voice recording files), CCTV video recording data;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (a statement by security personnel H or emergency medical technician G) and photographs taken at the place of occurrence;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 60(1)1 and 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of an order to provide community service and attend lectures;

arrow