logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.21 2015가단47651
공사대금 등
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to Plaintiff A the amount of KRW 6,4310,00 and the amount thereof from October 8, 2015 to the full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Around December 2013, Plaintiff A and real estate broker F entered into a real estate trading consulting service contract with Plaintiff B, Q, R, and S, the owner of the instant land (if individual lot numbers are displayed among the instant land or neighboring land, the number of the lot numbers is specified) including the land of this case, namely, C, H, I, J, K, K, L, L, L, N,O, P, etc. (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On April 26, 2014, Q from among the owners of the above land, concluded a sales contract with Defendant E with regard to “T, L, N, and O-land of 3,386 square meters,” and the Plaintiff B entered into a sales contract with Defendant D and three other parties on May 1, 2014 as to “79 square meters, out of 1,258 square meters,” respectively.

③ Around May 15, 2014, Q entered into a sales contract with Defendant E and four other parties to change the area into 3,407 square meters, although it is the same as the lot number of land subject to the sales contract, and Plaintiff B entered into a sales contract to change the area into 886 square meters, although it is the same as the lot number of land subject to the sales contract under the above sales contract, and entered into a sales contract to change the area to 886 square meters. As a special agreement, the sales contract was null

The actual purchaser of each of the above sales contracts was the Defendants.

C. The Defendants met Plaintiff A who is engaged in real estate development consulting services around April 2014 while implementing a project to develop the instant land and its neighboring land as a factory site, and concluded the above land sales contract with Plaintiff A with consulting services.

Plaintiff

A around July 7, 2014, around July 2014, a written agreement (hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”) between Defendant D and E, representing Defendant D and E, was prepared as follows:

Next, the plaintiff A, until July 31, 2014, is required for the site other than N, which is purchased by the defendants and is being developed and constructed by the defendants, for road construction (fume, fume, road securing, packing and completion of road construction (B-land).

arrow