logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.04.02 2014가합10831
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. As to the case of application for suspension of compulsory execution by this Court 2014 Chicago2156, Sep. 2014

Reasons

Basic Facts

On November 4, 2010, the Seoul Southern District Court rendered the following judgment (No. 2009Gahap12963) by filing a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, etc. against the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s debt obligations (hereinafter “the same case”).

1.For the same soil:

A. The non-party MIB consulting 13.5 billion won and 9% per annum from November 28, 2007 to February 28, 2008; 19% per annum from the next day to June 25, 2009; and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment;

B. The plaintiff and the non-party A (the plaintiff's employee) shall provide the IMA non-consulting services, respectively.

Of the money stated in paragraph (1), 5.24,740,00 won and 5.1,844,000 won among them shall be paid respectively from May 25, 2007; 122,896,00 won from November 28, 2007; 5% per annum from November 4, 2010 to the date of full payment; and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

2. Each of the claims against the plaintiff and the plaintiff A shall be dismissed.

On June 7, 2012, the Seoul High Court sentenced the instant judgment as follows.

The Plaintiff appealed against this and appealed (Supreme Court Decision 2012Da74260).

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against which the order to pay is rendered shall be revoked.

The plaintiff and A shall pay to each of them 3,918,55,00 won and 3,826,383,000 won from May 25, 2007; 92,172,00 won per annum from November 28, 2007 to June 7, 2012; and 5% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. The remaining appeals of the same soil and the appeal of the plaintiff, the plaintiff and the plaintiff A shall be dismissed;

On June 4, 2012, 4,686, 523,280 won out of the claim against the plaintiff of this case against the non-party corporation 3 (the plaintiff was the main defendant of this case, but the plaintiff withdrawn the lawsuit; hereinafter referred to as "Choho") after the provisional payment of the judgment by the plaintiff.

arrow