logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.09 2016가단114931
임금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall list the attached list to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

1. The assertion;

A. This lawsuit 1) The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant, a corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling agricultural products, who was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling agricultural products, and worked as a staff member in charge of business in the Cheongdo area from August 2010 to April 2016. However, the Defendant did not pay 16 million won for 16 months from January 2015 to April 2016, and did not pay wages of 7.6 million won for the total amount of retirement allowances of 7.6 million won during the period from August 1, 2010 to April 2016, and the Plaintiff did not pay 6.6 million won to the Defendant on November 19, 2013.

3) In addition, since the Defendant used the Plaintiff’s office as the Defendant’s temporary office from May 2009 to October 2013, the Plaintiff paid 4.8 million won of office rent and 5 million won of low temperature storage attached to the office. At the time of construction of the Defendant’s Cheongdo Governor, the Plaintiff spent 2 million won of building design cost at the time of construction of the building, and 5 million won of agreement for the Plaintiff to resolve a civil petition by neighboring land owners, the Defendant is ultimately liable to pay 16.8 million won of the above rent, etc. to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant is liable to pay 2.3) and 46.4 million won of the sum of the above rent, etc. to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant sought payment of money as stated in the purport of this claim. (B) On April 1, 2009, the Defendant took charge of the Plaintiff’s agent’s sales activities against the Cheongdo Provincial Farmers farmers’ Association.

2. However, as a result of the confirmation by the defendant, the plaintiff was not used for public relations for the sale of the attached half-time manufacturing machine, but for his own half-time manufacturing machine production, so the defendant terminated the half-time manufacturing agency contract, and the plaintiff is placed in the attached half-time manufacturing machine.

arrow