logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.06.16 2016가단1577
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 201.50,010,000, as well as 5% per annum from March 1, 2016 to June 16, 2016 and from the next day.

Reasons

1. Both claims;

A. The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total sum of KRW 31,400,000,000 to the Plaintiff by the end of December, 2014 as well as damages for delay following the delivery of the instant complaint.

① From January 2013 to December 2014, 2014, the Defendant purchased the Plaintiff’s share of KRW 2,0150,000,000,000 received from the Plaintiff while running the wholesale business together with the Plaintiff, and KRW 1,250,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

The defendant operated the business with the plaintiff for two years from January 2013.

The business was difficult and the operating expenses were borne by half.

Although it is recognized that there was a debt of 30 million won or more as alleged by the Plaintiff, the amount to be reduced by the Defendant for the following reasons does not exceed 14,019,250 won (31.4 million won - each of the following amounts).

(1) (3) The Roman loan amounting to KRW 10 million was repaid on February 17, 2016, and ② the purchase price for the fork owner’s vehicles was KRW 1250,000,000,000.

(2) (2) (1) 2,0150,000 won is a kind of investment loan, and necessary expenses should be deducted. The amount of electricity tax of 131,50,000 won and the amount of rent of 1,120,000 won (3 million won per year for a warehouse x 2.6 million won per year for a warehouse x 2 years x 2 years), which is half of the above total amount, should be deducted.

(3) The Plaintiff sold 750,000 won or less (50,000 won or less x 1.50,000 won) to Defendant D’s future, and acquired the price. The Plaintiff should also deduct 375,000 won or more, which is the Defendant’s share.

2. Of the money claimed by the Plaintiff, there is no dispute between the parties that the Defendant repaid the horse loan and the second purchase price as above.

arrow