logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단3107
사기
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, by imprisonment for six months, and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, along with his name-free winner (one-time I President), recruited a loan owner under Article 428 of the "K" in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City J, and prepares a false lease contract and mediates so-called working loan to the bank. Defendant B (one-time L director) is a person who mediates Defendant D to serve as a lessor at the request of Defendant A and I President, and Defendant C is a person who was introduced the I President through a name-free winner (M) and takes charge of the role as a lessee of a false lease contract.

As above, the Defendants continued to contact through I President and M, and used a false charter contract to complete the construction work by using a false charter contract, and had a financial institution as financial resources of the National Housing Fund, to divide the “workers and low-income housing rental fund” with loans from the National Housing Fund.

On September 3, 2013, the Defendants, along with I President, prepared a false lease agreement as if Defendant C, at the P Licensed Real Estate Agent, operated by the P Licensed Real Estate Agent (O) located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, set a deposit of KRW 140 million for Q3-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Defendant D, at KRW 140 million.

On September 6, 2013, Defendant C applied for a loan as if Defendant A and I were to use the loan as the deposit money in accordance with the outline of action at the time of application for a loan to the victim’s national bank located in the 4-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul. In addition, Defendant C submitted the false lease contract prepared by the employee in charge of the loan, and applied for a loan based on the genuine lease contract and received by the employee in charge of the loan.

The Defendants, in collusion with I President and M, deceiving the above branch of the victim, and deceiving the victim, which was then remitted 77 million won from the victim to the account under the name of the Defendant D on September 13, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A, B, and C.

arrow