logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.03 2013가단214546
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In 1980, the Plaintiff (D) received 4 chest - 2 scarcity surgery from the Seoul National University Hospital on the following grounds: (a) from around 2004, symptoms of low scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarke and right scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarke; (b) was invited to undergo surgery at the E Hospital on or around 2006, but refused to undergo surgery; (c) the symptoms worse from around October 201, 201; and (d) was admitted to the “F Hospital” established and operated by Defendant B on November 2, 201, and was diagnosed with the 3-4 scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity and the scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity snas

B. On November 3, 2011, at F Hospital, the Plaintiff received “the 3-4 post-explosion livering surgery” under Defendant C’s house (hereinafter “the instant surgery”), and immediately following the surgery, there was symptoms of the booming expenditure on both sides.

C. After that, at the E Hospital on January 13, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed to have permanently lost 52% of the work ability due to the removal of metal products before the 3-4th century and the removal of new post-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-con-factation, and the last day of November 8, 2012.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap's 1 to 3

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (i.e., breach of the duty of care under the surgery: Defendant C dealt with the operation organization in the instant surgery with care and damaged the scale of reception; and accordingly, the symptoms of the paralysis that were not on both sides were caused.

D. The violation of the duty to explain: on November 2, 201, the Plaintiff first transferred to the F Hospital; Defendant C recommended to immediately undergo an operation, and hospitalized the next day; and on the date of hospitalization, the merger certificate that may be caused by the operation during the process of preparing an operation and undergoing an operation.

arrow