Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The defendant represents C at the extraordinary general meeting of February 23, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Status 1 of the parties is an incorporated association established for the purpose of promoting domestic and overseas literature and arts. 2) The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is a person who was a director of the Defendant, and the Selection G (hereinafter “G”) is a representative director who is the Defendant’s representative authority (the Defendant’s corporate registry includes only the part that G was the first director, and only the part that was the “director,” and the Defendant’s articles of incorporation state that “no representative authority other than the directors exists,” and the name of “president,” is used by the Defendant’s articles of incorporation, and is between the Plaintiff and G couple.
B. Article 10 subparag. 10 of the Defendant’s 23 February 2016 (Resolution on Removal and Appointment of Officers at the Extraordinary General Meeting of February 23, 2016) (No. 919 of the Ministry of Justice No. 2016 and the minutes attached thereto ( February 23, 2016) prepared by a notary public who is a notary public on February 25, 2016) refer to the following agenda after attending the Defendant’s extraordinary general meeting held on February 23, 2016 and declaring the opening thereof. In the above extraordinary general meeting, four directors, including C, D, E, and H, present together with G, present with the above five directors at the same time, and present at the same time, remove the Plaintiff, K, and J from the Defendant’s director at the same time, and C, with the intent of maintaining the Defendant’s power of representation as the Defendant’s director’s director’s director’s representative, and the removal of directors from the Defendant’s office at the same time, even if the above resolution was adopted.