The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (two months of imprisonment and a fine of five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts of the crime of this case are found to have not significantly different from the date of the actual Domination in the judgment of the court below, but the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed on the date when the defendant processed the returned rice, etc. on a yearly basis, and falsely labeled the production year 201, while selling the rice in 2009 and the rice in 2011, which may cause significant confusion and uncertainty in the grain trade market. The major issue is that the defendant's total quantity of rice sold by falsely marking the production year is not 54,920 g, and the defendant committed the crime of this case with the imprisonment with prison labor for 10 years on October 18, 201 as indicated in the judgment of the court below, or with the imprisonment with prison labor for 20 years on the same date as that of the above case, each of the above crimes of this case's imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Marking of Agricultural and Fishery Products, and the judgment of the court below was finalized on July 21, 201301.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.