logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.24 2016가단5148350
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant D and E jointly share KRW 42,288,750 and their related thereto from May 26, 2016 to July 24, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 22:10 on June 17, 2015, Defendant E driven a Frentop car (hereinafter “Defendant E”) owned by Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant E”) in the vicinity of the Nam-dong-gu Incheon river basin near the 30-5 Home Plus-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon, and led Defendant E to Defendant E’s conjection by driving the Frentop car (hereinafter “Defendant E”) at a speed of five lanes, depending on the lux of five lanes located below the water line, while driving the above shooting distance at the right direction at the right right direction (in the direction of personal debate), Defendant E’s vehicle was prohibited from left the left at a rapid speed, and was going in the right direction at a rapid speed from the straight line (second-lane) located on the left side of the same direction, and then, Defendant E was conjected to Plaintiff E’s Hah to drive the vehicle, such as the front side of the Gwitter (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The place of the accident is a shooting distance located under the Incheon Active History, which is located under the competence of the main office located under the high-priced railway that is located under the front line. The two lanes where the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant vehicle are driving are prohibited from changing the lanes and making a left-hand turn in the intersection, and only a right-hand turn is allowed. Furthermore, the two-lanes where the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant vehicle are driving and the two-lanes where the plaintiff vehicle are driving and the vehicle are driving, a large original pole, which is a structure supporting high-priced railroads, has been installed. The accident hours were nights around 22:10.

Therefore, it may be anticipated that the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle could not see the Defendant’s vehicle in advance by entering the Plaintiff’s vehicle in violation of his own car line in order to turn to the left within the intersection while driving on the exclusive lane located on the right side of the original pole as above at a higher level.

arrow