1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 32,315,79 and shall also pay to the plaintiff on October 201.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a)The following facts may be found either in dispute between the Parties or in each entry or image of Gap evidence 2, 3, 15, and 16 (including the number with which each number is attached; hereinafter the same shall apply) by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings:

1) B is the Defendant’s vehicle at around 00:10 on October 7, 201, C New Daily vehicle at around 00:10 on October 7, 2011

(ii)the driver is the vehicle of the plaintiff who is driven by the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the "the plaintiff") who was driven by the plaintiff who was driven in the direction of the center and was driven by the plaintiff, who was driven in the direction of the center, after receiving a right turn turn turn from the bank to the nearest lake of the white village in the middle of the Goyang-dong-gu, U.S. P. P. P. P.

) The front part of the above vehicle was shocked to the front part of the above vehicle, and the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the upper part of the above vehicle's upper part, the upper part of the pelle and the pelle to the left part, the upper part of the pelle, the right pelle, the right pelle to the right pelle, etc. (hereinafter "accident").

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) the following circumstances are acknowledged in the above facts; (b) the Defendant’s vehicle continued to have entered the intersection at a speed of not more than 20km, namely, the vehicle is deemed to have entered the intersection, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle appears to have entered the intersection at a rapid speed than the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle appears to have entered the intersection; and (c) the Plaintiff is also allowed to make a left-hand turn to the left-hand turn at the intersection, and if the Defendant’s vehicle in the front bank was first at the right-hand turn to the left-hand turn at the intersection, the Defendant’s vehicle is safe as well.