1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasons why the court should explain the quoted part of this case are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the case where the pertinent judgment is stated in the first instance court's 301, 401, and 402 above" in the first instance court's 3, 301, 301, and 402 above, and in the sixth 4, "in light of the above" in the second 6th 4th , it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it is citing it as

2. Additional entry: (5) The defendant mentioned the joint security only in H and G collateral to the effect that it can be resolved at the amount of KRW 10,000 or below, respectively, and the defendant stated that it is not a joint security in relation to the Korea Livestock Industry Cooperatives (the defendant stated that it is not a superior due to other co-ownership, and that it is the remaining bank? The above 402 is not an existing tenant, and it seems that the plaintiff would not use 21 million won for the purpose other than the original purpose of cancellation of the right to collateral security (7). (7) The plaintiff changed the object of the contract to KRW 401 without the defendant's brokerage to KRW 30,000 for the purpose of cancellation of the right to collateral security (30,000 for the purpose of cancellation of the right to collateral security).