logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.26 2018고합202
강도상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

Seized evidence No. 9 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment for special robbery at the Incheon District Court on May 28, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 29, 2017.

【Around February 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) affected the victim D (Woo, 42 years of age) who was living in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C or lower, by intrusion into another apartment building with an open door; (b) obstructed the object of the crime; and (c) obstructed the victim’s opening and going up with the stairs; and (d) obstructed the victim’s opening and going up with the entrance; and (c) obstructed the victim’s face with a dangerous weapon, which was in possession of the victim in advance, with the victim’s knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, and carried with the knife, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Protocols of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. The blade description and picture attached to a criminal investigation report (a color attached to a blade used for committing a crime), a criminal investigation report (a photograph of seized articles), a criminal investigation report (a photograph of seized articles), a criminal investigation report (a photograph of seized articles -2), and each photograph attached to a criminal investigation report (a photograph of all seized articles);

1. 112 A report processing table;

1. Previous conviction: Inquiry about criminal history and investigation report (report on attachment of the current status of confinement of each suspect) (the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not possess a blade at the time of committing the crime;

However, the victim argued in the police and prosecutor's investigation that "the knife his knife from the paper cited by the defendant and the suppressions his knife his knife on his face.

arrow