Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 01:05 on July 2, 2017, entered a D hotel located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) made it difficult for the Defendant to avoid disturbance, such as entering the D hotel; (c) sending out the hotel route; and (d) engaging in talking, drinking, and taking a bath against the

Accordingly, the victim E (31) who is an employee in charge of the security of the above hotel, demanded that the defendant go against the above defendant and go from the hotel street several times, and the defendant failed to walk over about 20 minutes by repeating it to the victim and many guests using the hotel with a large voice "I amb".

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's hotel business by force.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 7. 2. 01:15 경 전 항 기재 장소에서, 호텔 안에서 술에 취해 난동을 부리는 사람이 있다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 종로 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 경위 G으로부터 호텔 안에서 고함을 지르고 욕설을 한 경위에 대해 질문을 받게 되자 이에 격분하여, 위 G에게 “ 이 씹할 새끼야! 내가 뭘 잘못했냐

Governance Babi Doz.

Note to be reported to the audit office of the hearing.

Recognizing that “A person takes a bath in a large sound,” assaulting the chest of the said G, such as pushing the chest of the said G, drinking, etc., and drinking at the same time.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. Each statement of E, H and I;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the selection of fines, respectively, for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a provisional payment order shall be issued.