logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.06.12 2013고합341
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복상해등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2013, the defendant filed a complaint against the victim D (nive, 34 years of age) that violated the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users at the Changwon District Court on July 17, 2013, and the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users (hereinafter "Credit Business

There is a fact that a fine of KRW 3 million has been sentenced.

At around 18:00 on October 17, 2013, the Defendant, even though he did not appear before the elevator of the first floor of the Seongbuk-gu Etel in Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, the victim was unable to do so, and the victim was sleeped with the breath's breath, and the victim was damaged on the left-hand 2 balance of 2 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. The inquiry and reply of each fact to the F Hospital and the Changwon Police Station;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A complaint filed in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of injury diagnosis certificates and investigation reporting statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that although the defendant had spawned any fact, he/she did not injure the victim, he/she did not do so.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: (a) the Defendant did not have the victim as soon as possible in the above officetels; (b) the Defendant did not have the victim; (c) the Defendant did not have the victim; and (d) the Defendant did not have the victim; and (c) the Defendant did not pay a fine of KRW 3 million due to width, etc.; and (d) the Defendant was punished by the Defendant’s flabing of flabs of the victim; (b) the Defendant flabing the Defendant’s hand, etc.; and (c) during this process.

arrow