1. All incidental appeals by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the appeal by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. An objection to the trial;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, around 14:30 on May 8, 2014, when they were in dispute with each other in front of the Defendant’s house located in Gyeongnam-gun, not around 14:30, while they were in dispute with each other, the Plaintiff was aware of the Defendant’s breath, and the Defendant was punished by the Defendant, such as flabing the Plaintiff’s flaps and making the Plaintiff’s flab, and flabing the Plaintiff’s flab, and D, the Plaintiff’s husband, was in favor of

(hereinafter “instant dispute”). B.

The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as spawal spawal spawal spawals and spawal spawal spawals (dus, spawal spawals, spawal spawals, and left-hand spawals) due to the instant dispute. From May 8, 2014 to May 28, 2014 at Seoul Hospital, the Plaintiff received hospital treatment from May 29, 2014 to June 3, 2014.

The Defendant suffered injury, due to the dispute over the instant case, such as a spawre in a hole of a wooden hole which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, spawdum salt, tension, spawduming, and so on.

C. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant destroyed the Plaintiff’s stone tin of the instant place of business by using a black box immediately after the instant dispute occurred.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff and D and the Defendant filed a complaint after the instant dispute. On September 26, 2014, when the investigation is underway, submitted a written withdrawal of the complaint to the effect that they do not want to be punished by mutual agreement. On October 21, 2014, the North Korean District Prosecutors' Office rendered a decision to suspend indictment regarding the Plaintiff’s bodily injury in the instant case, the decision to suspend indictment, the decision to not have the right to prosecute the Defendant as to the crime of assault against D, and the decision to suspend indictment regarding the Defendant’s violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and the crime of bodily injury against D.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, and Eul evidence No. 2 (including each number), video, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the main claim

A. At the time of the instant dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion would make an insulting speech to the Plaintiff, such as “Isson who attempted to live in the Plaintiff.”