logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.09.05 2018고단1647
뇌물수수
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and fines for two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for three million won, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

From July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017, A, while serving as the director of the accounting information of the CGun Office, in charge of the disbursement management, settlement of accounts, negotiated contracts, bidding, and property management of the CGun Office, performed his duties as the final approving authority when concluding a negotiated contract by the CGun Office. Defendant B, while operating the D'D', performed five interior works ordered by a private contract from July 17, 2016 to April 4, 2017.

1. Around February 27, 2017, Defendant B offered a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties by providing the following: (a) at the “A’s house located under the building F,” the four interior interior works ordered by the CGun Office to select D as the construction company under a negotiated contract; and (b) at the future, the Defendant selected D as the construction company under a negotiated contract; and (c) providing various convenience, such as designating D as the construction company under a negotiated contract.

2. Defendant A received a bribe in relation to duties by receiving a request for delivery of various convenience, such as designating D as a contractor by a negotiated contract, from the four interior works ordered by CGun Office from B to the construction company, at the same time and place as set forth in the above Paragraph (1). Defendant A received a request for delivery of various convenience and received a bribe in relation to duties by receiving a request for a heavy replacement of construction work equivalent to KRW 820,000 at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor and police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The written statement of each police officer against Defendant A and G;

1. A written resolution, a mid-to-door photograph, written estimate, and a personnel record card of public officials;

1. Details of construction works (D), confirmation letter of the results of electronic financial transfer, accounting information and employee allocation table of each C military office;

1. Details of contracts (D) and accompanying documents, reports on internal investigation (D) and accompanying documents;

1. Determination of the contract details X-cell defendants and defense counsel's assertion

1. The main point of the argument is that Defendant A suffers from a sudden breakdown around February 2017.

arrow