logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.10.17 2016고정1211
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of "D" in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, who runs meat packaging business, and Eul is a person engaged in processing and repackaging pigs in the above D.

No one shall place any indication or advertisement different from facts or exaggerated in relation to the names, manufacturing methods, ingredients, dietitians, raw materials, uses, quality, and packaging of livestock products.

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on June 1, 2016, E, the Defendant’s employees, processed and packages for the purpose of selling the pigs 72km (18km 4 gambling) ordered by the trading company within the said D shop, and stored in a freezing warehouse by attaching a Belgium indicating an increase in the distribution period at will from June 1, 2016 to July 14, 2016, according to the standards for the labelling of livestock products, “from June 1, 2016 to 3 weeks”, which is the due date for the distribution of raw materials meat, according to the standards for the labelling of livestock products.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is the employee of the defendant, has falsely marked the deadline for the distribution of livestock products processed by the defendant's employee, and re-sealed them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statements of E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Business registration certificate and permit;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (on-site control details and accompanying photographs, the currency of the enforcement officer, and photographs of each field);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 46, 45(3), and 32(1)2 of the former Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act (Amended by Act No. 14025, Feb. 3, 2016);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. There is no fact that the Defendant did not employ E and there is no fact that he participated in the purchase of the instant swine scrap or in the indication of the distribution deadline.

E is the instant swine machine.

arrow