logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고정864
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of the B-learning vehicle, who is engaged in driving of the said vehicle.

【2016 High Court Decision 864】

1. No person shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, on February 1, 2016, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation by operating the said vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 30 meters from the front road of 64 Maart-ro from the front road of 135 Mazon-ro to the front road of 135 Mazon-ro, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 201.

【2016 High Court Decision 865】

2. On February 15, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.154% in blood around 21:10, while driving the said vehicle, and driven the side road of the area C building in front of the area of Suwon City with approximately 5km/h in the direction of the livestock industry at the nests real estate room.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to make the traffic situation well reported and safely drive the motor vehicle to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, has been negligent in performing the above duty of care, and the victim D (42 S, South) driving e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e-motor vehicle e

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the victim D and the victim F (41 tax, female) of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim's vehicle, and on the part of the victim, the Defendant suffered from the injury requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment for the fluence and tension.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. Related photographs (the facts of judgment No. 2);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A traffic accident;

arrow