Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On the premise, the Defendants, on February 2016, had C representative D to perform the studio construction work in Defendant A’s housing site, and the construction cost is insufficient, and the Defendants borrowed KRW 200 million from E and carried the said D as a guarantor.

After that, on March 2016, the Defendants were urged to pay the principal from E, and then the Defendants borrowed the principal from E as construction expenses.

There is a lack of money to pay KRW 200 million in full, and D provided that “I have to lend money to 200 million won,” and that “I have to have a surety to believe that I have to lend money, and to provide a certain security.”

2. Criminal facts;

A. On March 2016, the Defendants gathered the crime of defraudation, such as: “The president lends KRW 200 million to the D president” from the Kaf G located in the Full-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by acquiring a loan certificate from the victim H; and then borrowing the loan certificate to D with KRW 200 million as security, and then borrowing the loan certificate to E with KRW 200 million.”

On the 22th day of the same month, the Defendants, in the above car page, requested the victim to use a loan certificate as “the financial flow and transaction data of KRW 150 million are required,” and the transferred money is transferred to the account fixed by us only when it is transferred to the account fixed by us.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendants, as seen above, thought to be used for securing the above 200 million won obligation by deceiving the victim, and did not intend to use it as financial flow and transaction data, but the Defendants received a loan certificate from the victim to “the debtor H, creditor I (former J), and the amount of the loan amount of KRW 150 million” on the same day, and caused the victim to bear the liability of KRW 150 million.

In this way, the Defendants deceptioned the victim and received false loan certificates as above, thereby acquiring the amount of monetary benefits.

5. Prosecutors.