logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.11 2015나36581
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a dentist who establishes and operates a “Cental Department”.

From April 27, 201, the Plaintiff (D) first fested to the Defendant’s dental surgery, and first fested to spawn an existing artificial baby and natural pawn out, laid off seven strings, and opened up 8,500,000 won around 20, and agreed to pay for the medical expenses. From May 9, 201, 201, the Plaintiff (D) received medical treatment, such as planting 5, 2,000, from July 27, 2011, and received medical treatment from time to time for several months.

B. From the beginning of February 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) from around 12, 2012, around 12, there were symptoms showing a scam and scam in the scam when eating food; (b) on the part of the Defendant’s dental surgery for about one month, there was no particular improvement in symptoms.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff paid KRW 6,500,000 to the Defendant out of the agreed medical expenses. However, on March 10, 2012, the Plaintiff demanded that the Defendant’s dental employee pay the remainder of the medical expenses to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s protested that the agreed medical treatment was not completed.

C. On March 19, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant and its employees on the grounds that “the Plaintiff forced the Plaintiff to leave one franchis without the Plaintiff’s consent during the process of performing the franchising procedure, and 10 artificial franchis are so high that the Plaintiff would have inflicted damage on the Plaintiff by disposing of the franchising.” (the prosecutor of the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office issued a non-prosecution disposition to the Defendant on June 14, 2012). On March 19, 2012, the Plaintiff first transferred the Defendant to the Seoul National University Hospital’s dental hospital and received a diagnosis that requires the treatment of the franchis.

arrow