logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.08.27 2013고단1490
유가증권변조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2012, the Defendant changed securities: (a) stated “10,000,000 won in the face value column of the face value of KRW 1,000,000 in the face value in the promissory note in custody, which was received from D as collateral at the Defendant’s residence located in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Da 904, 1502, as collateral; and (b) inserted “0,000,000” in front of “0,000.”

Accordingly, the Defendant modified a bill of promissory note in the name of securities D for the purpose of exercising its rights.

2. Alteration of securities;

A. On May 2012, the Defendant filed a complaint against D in fraud with the public service center of the Seoul Jungdong Police Station located in Jungdong-gu Seoul, Jungdong-gu, Seoul and 249-2, the Defendant submitted a promissory note, the securities of which was modified, to the police officers in charge of false name, as if it were duly prepared.

Accordingly, the Defendant exercised one promissory note in the name of D, which is the securities altered.

B. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant filed an application for provisional seizure of real estate at the Seoul Northern District Court civil petition office of the Seoul Northern District Court located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 626, Dobong-gu, Seoul, and submitted a promissory note, which is the securities modified, as if it were genuinely prepared, to the employee in charge of the fact of the alteration.

Accordingly, the Defendant exercised one promissory note in the name of D, which is the securities altered.

C. On January 15, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against D in the civil petition office of the Seoul Northern District Court at the time unsatisfying Seoul Northern District Court, and submitted a revised promissory note, which is the securities, as seen above, to a staff in charge of the unsatisfying the fact of the alteration.

Accordingly, the Defendant exercised one promissory note in the name of D, which is the securities altered.

3. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, around January 15, 2013, filed a lawsuit claiming KRW 20 million against the victim D by civil petition offices of the Seoul Northern District Court.

arrow