logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.06.20 2017나27114
손해배상
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the defendant A and the defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) with the amount exceeding the following order for payment:

Reasons

1. The reasons for this case by the court of first instance are as follows: the Plaintiff’s statement No. 11 to 13 submitted at the trial were insufficient evidence; the Plaintiff’s statement No. 2 at the trial of the first instance is as to the counterclaim; the Plaintiff’s statement No. 3 at the third instance judgment is as to “Defendant A”; the Defendant’s statement No. 3 at the third instance judgment is as to “Defendant A”; the Defendant’s statement No. 4 at the third and fourth 5 at the trial of the first instance judgment is as to “Defendant”; the Defendant’s statement No. 6 at the third 9 and 11 at the 0th 5th 6th 6th 5th 6th 7th 900 x the Defendant’s statement that “No. 23th 9th 5th 90 x the Defendant’s statement that “No. 30th 5th 9th 9th 90 x the Defendant’s statement that “No. 230th 5th 9th 15th 9th 2.”.

"..."

arrow