Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 30, 2014, at around 20:30, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from the Defendant that the Defendant was taking a bath to D while drinking alcohol at the above main point in the road of the trade name “C,” which is located in the Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Haan-gun, a police officer belonging to the Haan Police Station Eba Police Station, who was called out after receiving a 112 report that the Defendant was taking a bath to D while drinking alcohol at the above main point; and (b) took a bath to ascertain the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant: (c) Daa, “The name was changed to the head of the police station and well known; and (d) was satched with both hands.”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crimes: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Suspension of execution: Reasons for sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation]: Where the area of mitigation of performance of official duties (one to one month) (Special mitigated person): In cases of minor degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme (determination of sentence): Imprisonment with prison labor for four months, suspension of execution of one year (in cases of reflectivity, absence of the same kind of power, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is relatively minor, etc.); and