1. The Defendant: (a) from June 16, 201, to Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 5,00,000, KRW 500,000, and each of the above amounts.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On June 15, 2016, Plaintiff A was a father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff A was a mother of Plaintiff A, while crossing the Plaintiff’s vehicle at a crosswalk in front of the Gangseo-gu Police Station 2439 Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, 2016, where the pedestrian signal, etc. was occupied by the Plaintiff A. As such, Plaintiff A was injured by analogicalitis, Damppris, Dampris, salpris, salpris, salpris, and salpris, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

3) The Defendant concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with D as to the foregoing vehicle. [The reasons for recognition are as follows: Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as an insurer.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. According to the result of the court's physical examination of the head of the Sille Seoul National University Hospital, the plaintiff A is recognized to have caused an over-fluoral reflector on the right full part of the court's physical examination of the head of the Sille Seoul National University:2 x 2 m, 3 x 3 x 2 m on the right part, 3 x 1 cm on the left part, 4 x 2 x 2 x 4 x 2 on the face, which requires 1,53

If this is deemed to be spent on the date of closing the argument and is present at the time of the accident, it shall be KRW 1,441,875 as follows:

In the future, the payment period of the cost required for treatment in the event of an accident 1,538,00 semi-salvable type 1,538,00 October 24, 2017 1,441,875

B. According to the evidence No. 1, it is recognized that D, the driver of the vehicle involved in the instant accident, paid KRW 5,00,000 in agreement with the Plaintiff in the criminal conciliation procedure regarding the instant accident. In the event that the victim received the money under the pretext of the agreement from the perpetrator in the course of investigation or criminal trial against the perpetrator of the tort, the above amount is specially paid as consolation money.