1. The Defendant: KRW 80,367,243 to Plaintiff A; KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 2,50,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) F is the Gpoter 2 Cargo (hereinafter “Defendant”) around November 1, 2015, around 15:40 on November 15, 2015.

A) While driving a vehicle and making a left-hand turn on the road of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, the driver neglected the duty of front-down and did not discover the Plaintiff who crossinged the road to the right side from the left side of the Defendant vehicle in the direction of the operation of the Defendant vehicle, thereby receiving the Plaintiff A with the front-hander of the Defendant vehicle and causing injury to the Plaintiff A, such as an external shocking blood (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a mutual aid project operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to Defendant vehicle.

B. According to the above findings of recognition of liability, as the Plaintiff sustained injury due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant is liable for compensating for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as the mutual aid business operator of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring

C. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff Company A, who worked for I Company, provided information on the progress of the vehicle in connection with the water supply and sewerage construction works installed on the instant road, provided information on the left-hand turn of the Defendant vehicle; the left-hand turn of the Defendant vehicle was not terminated; and the fact that the instant accident occurred while the Plaintiff moved to the front-hand side of the Defendant vehicle while the pedestrian signal, etc. on the crosswalk was red and moved to the front-hand side of the Defendant vehicle.

The negligence of the Plaintiff A has contributed significantly to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages, and thus, it shall be taken into account. However, in light of various circumstances shown in the pleading, the Plaintiff A’s negligence shall be deemed 25% and the Defendant’s liability shall be limited to 75%.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 3, 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The scope of liability for damages shall be as follows, and the period of time for the convenience of calculation shall be monthly: