The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 01:40 on December 23, 2010, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim E, who reported the Kabter on the ground that the Defendant was not sent to the Kabter in credit in the “D” Kabro-Gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, in his hand on one hand; and (b) assaulted the victim E, who was reporting the Kabter out of the Kabter, on one hand, into the Kabbro and kne E’s mathro, by taking the tabro from the Kabro.

2. The judgment below is the case falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim appeared in this court on April 1, 2014 as a witness and stated that he did not wish to punish the defendant, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.