beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Busan District Court-2018-Na51591 (2019.05)
Title
It is not a fraudulent act because it is for the repayment of the debt of the person (psychful conduct) or for the division of property at the time of divorce.
Summary
(1) The first remittance is not a fraudulent act because it is either for the repayment of one's own debt or for the division of property at the time of divorce, and even if the second remittance constitutes the repayment of the debt, it is insufficient to view it as a collusion.
Related statutes
Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act Revocation of Fraudulent Act
Cases
2019Da229035 Revocation of Fraudulent Act
Plaintiff-Appellee
Korea
Defendant-Appellant
1. Kim AA 2. EB
Judgment of the lower court
Busan District Court 2018Na51591
Imposition of Judgment
July 24, 2019
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per