The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant, from around 201 to 201, worked together with the victim and the mobile phone agency; (b) when the victim became aware of another male ties, he/she committed the instant crime only by doing the same kind of business with the said agency; (c) the instant case, by the termination of the mobile phone agency contract that the Defendant worked for the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant had no record of criminal punishment due to sex offense, the lower court’s sentence ordering the Defendant to complete the sexual assault treatment program for a period of one year and 80 hours is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case, which is a mobile phone agent, took two times against the will of the victim who was employed as an employee by installing an USB-type camera under the office's office, and purchased gifts, and followed the victim's body. However, it is not good that the victim displayed the victim's body photographs sent by another male and the deceased's body by attaching them two times to the male and the deceased's body, and offered them two times in spite of the above lending, the crime of this case is not good. The defendant committed the crime of this case in the investigation process, but at the trial, it is difficult for the victim to defend himself about the circumstances of the crime of this case, such as that it is apprehended that the victim will conduct the same kind of business as male's body and that the victim has committed the crime of this case. The victim was released from the workplace for eight years after the victim attends the crime of this case, and the victim was punished by the victim and his family members in the process of civil litigation, but it was requested that the victim and his family members were punished by the victim.