Text
1. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B for the cancellation of the pledge transfer contract as of February 19, 2014 among the instant lawsuit against Defendant B.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) from May 30, 2001 to January 19, 2004.
(D) The agreement on the warranty of defects that guarantees the obligation to repair defects for a newly constructed apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant warranty agreement”) on several occasions.
The E Group E is a business group consisting of 14 companies, including D, F, G, and Defendant A. Pursuant to the instant defect repair agreement, if the Plaintiff performs the defect repair obligation on behalf of D pursuant to the instant defect repair agreement, the E Group E is a joint and several surety (hereinafter “instant joint and several surety agreement”).
2) The main contents of the instant contract for the repair of defects are as follows.
▣ 하자보수보증약정서 제11조(사전구상) 약정인 또는 연대보증인에게 다음 각 호의 1에 해당하는 사유가 발생함과 동시에 기한의 이익을 상실하여 변제기가 도래하며, 귀사가 보증한 금액에 대하여 통지 또는 최고 없이 당연히 사전상환채무를 부담하여 이를 지체 없이 변상하겠으며, 귀사가 미리 구상권을 행사하여도 이의를 제기하지 않겠습니다.
1. 귀사가 정하는 보증의 금지 또는 제한사유가 발생한 때 ▣ 보증규정 제8조(보증의 금지) ① 보증신청인 또는 공동으로 보증을 신청하는 경우에는 공동보증신청인 중 1인이 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 경우에는 보증을 금지한다.
4. Where he/she has filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures (excluding cases where he/she has obtained authorization thereof) under the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act;
B. The Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement against C 1) D filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures with the Seoul Central District Court on June 26, 2012, but on April 1, 2014, it was decided to discontinue rehabilitation procedures (2012 Gohap 116, and the same month.