1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A Co., Ltd.: 2,484,891,750 won and 11,98,284,588 won among them.

In addition, all incidental obligations, including the legal procedure costs and costs of lawsuit, will be paid immediately by adding the amount of damages for all incidental obligations. In the event that the grounds falling under any of the following subparagraphs have occurred to the person who entered into the prior claim(s) or the joint guarantor(s) of Article 11, the person who entered into the prior claim(s) will lose the benefit of time and bear the obligation of repayment in advance without any notice or peremptory notice on the amount of the guarantee by which he would be entitled to reimburse without delay, and even in the exercise of the prior claim(s) shall not raise any objection. 1. When the grounds for prohibition or restriction of the guarantee set forth in the due date arise, the joint guarantor(s) of Article 14 shall be deemed to have affixed his name and seal on the documents such as the application for the guarantee traded under this Agreement, and shall not raise any objection on the transaction, and shall be jointly and severally liable with the agreed person(s) and the joint guarantor(s). *Article 9(Restriction on Guarantee) of the Guarantee Regulation(s).

3. Where the principal and interest of the company is in arrears with the repayment of the loan or guaranteed loan (limited to where the interest on the loan is in arrears for not less than one month), the respective warranty agreement of this case and the guarantee regulations of the plaintiff set forth by the plaintiff are as follows. 5) On the other hand, the plaintiff stipulates that "500,000 won (in case of cash repayment, additional tax shall be paid) shall be paid (in case of cash payment: indemnity claim)" in the criteria for the settlement

6) Since September 15, 1999, the agreed delay interest rate applied pursuant to each of the above warranty obligations agreements is 14% per annum. D. 1) The council of occupants’ representatives of H apartments (hereinafter “H council of occupants’ representatives”) is the Plaintiff on April 19, 2013 due to the Defendant’s default, with the agreement on the performance of the repair of H (Ulsan Nam-gu L)’s defect repair performance.