Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cystren vehicles.

On January 24, 2016, around 18:40, the Defendant came to the left-hand turn on the side of the horse market at the right side of the horse market at the Doma 4, depending on the two-lanes in front of the Doma 22-lane in the middle-gu bankruptcy of Daejeon.

At the time, the driver of a motor vehicle was at night and in both direction signal, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by checking whether there is a motor vehicle driven on the opposite vehicle line, and if the safety is sufficiently secured, the left-hand turn has to be prevented.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left on the opposite line by negligence, and received the front part of the victim D(W, 54 years old) driving E Epip vehicle in front of the right part of the Epip vehicle from the victim D(W, 54 years old) to the right part of the Defendant’s rocketing-top vehicle and the pan part.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, even though the said vehicle was damaged to an extent equivalent to KRW 2,445,056, the Defendant left the vehicle and escaped without taking measures, such as aiding and abetting the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A traffic accident investigation report, accident site photograph, CD (on-site image);

1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);

1. The defendant asserts that the medical certificate and quotation (the defendant thought that the damaged person will come to contact through the insurance company after printing the defendant's vehicle photograph, and that he did not intend to escape from the field.

However, according to the above evidence, the defendant after the occurrence of the instant traffic accident.