1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. All plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

3. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 30, 1956, the deceased C (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) put into the military forces and served as a distribution source at the third soldiers group of the third soldiers group of the Army, the third soldiers group of the Army, 72 soldiers group of the third soldiers group of the Army.

B. Around January 1, 1959, the Deceased died, and the Defendant notified the bereaved family members, including the Plaintiffs, of the purport that “the deceased was on duty in the military unit belonging to the military unit on January 1, 1959, and was sick with two influences, brain-dead, and two heat windows.”

The Deceased was cremation on the 15th of the same month.

C. At the time of the deceased’s death, the deceased was F, F, and the plaintiffs, who were wife E, son, and E, after the deceased’s death, re-born on May 20, 1969 and left G as their children.

(E had one more children, but it died without another inheritor before the commencement of the inheritance for E). (D)

E died on March 14, 1999.

E. On November 19, 201, Fson of the Deceased received a civil petition from the Investigation Headquarters of the Ministry of National Defense demanding a re-inspection of the cause of the Deceased’s death, and the Investigation Headquarters of the Ministry of National Defense shall not be “sicker’s death,” but “on-board” (afforting a military unit vehicle while driving a vehicle for a military unit on board the Deceased’s ffort while driving a vehicle for a military unit on board the Deceased (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(ii)The Committee of the Army Headquarters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Committee”) presented its opinion that the deceased was killed after having been killed due to brain-dead death, etc., and requested a review to the Committee for the Reexamination of the previous Death of the Army Headquarters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Committee”). As a result, the Committee corrected the deceased’s private person from “sick” to “sick’s death,” and notified F of this on January 28, 2013.

F. At the central high-ranking court conference around 1959, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for 8 months and one year of suspended execution with respect to a person who was related to the breaon caused by the above drunk driving, but the judgment was not written as a victim by the Deceased.

G. F. On February 14, 2014, on the ground of the deceased’s death and the Defendant’s private concealment act against the Defendant, F.C.