1. The Defendant: 11,625,00 won to Plaintiff A; 4,20,000 won to Plaintiff B; and 1,950 won to Plaintiff C.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: E - Defendant - Project operator: Public notice of the approval of implementation plan: The F for Gwangju City on August 31, 2015;

B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on January 14, 2019 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”) - Subject to expropriation and compensation for losses: as indicated below:

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant lands,” and the individual land shall be specified with the lot number stated). The Plaintiff’s land A for expropriation of KRW 326,275,00, G 310 square meters and KRW 15,787,500, an annual 117,880,000, an annual 15,000 square meters and KRW 15,780,000, and KRW 524,730,000, and KRW 522,000,000,000, in total, for the land A for expropriation of the Plaintiff: February 28, 2019.

As a result of the appraisal by the appraisal by the appraiser K of this court, the court did not have any dispute over the following facts: (a) the amount of KRW 16,350,00,000, KRW 15222,080,000, KRW 310,000, KRW 337,90,000, KRW 105,730,000, KRW 157,000,000, KRW 16,350,000, KRW 122,080,000, KRW 56,680,000, KRW 50,000,000, KRW 56,680,000, KRW 310,000,00

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs’ instant expropriation ruling was unfairly underassessment of losses for each of the instant lands.

Therefore, the defendant should pay compensation for losses and losses for delay as stated in the remaining purport of the claim which deducts the adjudication of acceptance of this case from compensation for losses due to the court's appraisal that was properly calculated by the plaintiffs.

B. In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation 1, in case where each appraisal and each court appraiser, which form the basis of the judgment, are not unlawful in the assessment methods, and there is no other reason to believe that the remaining factors except for goods, etc. are different in view of the price assessment methods, but there is a difference in the appraisal results due to a somewhat different relation only with goods, etc., one of them shall be the content of the relevant appraisal.