The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 22,715,00 per annum from May 11, 2019 to April 23, 2020 and the next day.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business name: C-Project for urban planning facilities (green areas and vacant public land): Defendant-project approval: Public announcement in Gwangju City on January 19, 2018;

B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on March 26, 2019 (hereinafter “the ruling of expropriation in this case”): The object of expropriation is 120 square meters, 107 square meters, 107 square meters, 287 square meters, and 287 square meters in Gi-si, Gwangju-si (hereinafter “land subject to expropriation in this case”), and the date of expropriation: May 10, 2019 - Compensation for losses: The following column is written.

- Appraisal Corporation: I & J.

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on November 21, 2019 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Dismissal of an objection - An appraisal corporation: K and L Company.

D. The appraisal result of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - The appraisal value: The appraisal value is as indicated below in the “court appraisal amount” column.

Serial Decision on Expropriation of Land subject to Expropriation (won) No. 1 E No. 17,840,840,000-11,760-11,748,500-2 Fetet No. 107,111,00,362,500-9, 362,500-3 G 254,138,500-279,251,000,251,000-254,138,50-7,251,000-251,000-25,112,500-25,478,487,500-12,50-201,202,207,2071,2005,000-271, 200

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff 1's assertion that the compensation amount of the land subject to expropriation of this case falls short of a reasonable compensation by evaluating the price of the land subject to expropriation of this case excessively low. Thus, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the amount equivalent to the difference between the legitimate compensation amount due to the court's appraisal and the compensation amount due to the decision of expropriation of this case. The amount claimed by the defendant as the additional compensation amount for the land subject to expropriation of this case is the other land