1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following amount:

1. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the court recognizes liability for damages or not is responsible for the reasons indicated in this part are as stated in Paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for those written in the following. Therefore, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From 4, 6th to 11th of the first instance judgment shall be as follows.

"However, according to the above evidence, the plaintiff A, within the second floor of the construction site of this case, did work to remove the board from the outside of a siren so that the plaintiff A can catch and remove the board using a siren to remove it. On the same day, the plaintiff A attempted to cut the above board by using the Bara in the last part of the rail in order not to easily fall off.

At the time of the above removal work, the two floors used sirens, a criminal complaint worker, but in the inside and outside, the safety devices were not used.

Therefore, inasmuch as Plaintiff A is not engaged in work in the outside sirens of the second floor, but is at the risk of fall when working in the last part of the interior rail of the second floor, it is necessary to check the situation of the work and take necessary measures to prevent the fall to the manager, etc., or to use safety devices, etc., such as safety devices, etc. in order to assist others to work in an unsatisfy, and was involved in an accident. The accident in this case is the most significant reason that Plaintiff A, while having no safety equipment or assistant, has carried out work in a tindle.