(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.28 2015나2028744

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.28 2015나2028744

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons stated in this part of the underlying facts are as stated in the part of “1. Basic Facts” from 17th to 20th 6th 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasoning of this part of the plaintiffs' assertion is as follows, except for the part added or used by the court below, since it is identical to the part of "the plaintiffs' assertion" from 21 to 7th 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to the 7th sentence of the first instance court:

D. In particular, the part in the attached list No. 1 stating that Plaintiff B embezzled public funds of the Plaintiff Association. The Defendants, by preparing and distributing the data of this case and inserting the same writing, damaged the Plaintiffs’ honor. Even if the data of this case and the above writing are not false, the Defendants have undermined the Plaintiffs’ honor by publicly alleging facts. E. Defendant F posted a statement in [Attachment No. 1] No. 7 of [Attachment No. 7] in [Attachment No. 7], stating that “There are illegal marks in the list No. 26” in [Attachment No. 1], on the Internet camera, and the above Defendant damaged the Plaintiffs’ honor. In addition, Defendant E posted a statement in the Internet camera of June 7, 2014 that defames the Plaintiffs’ honor. Defendant E added a statement in accordance with the “No. 7 Item 6 of the judgment of the first instance court.”

3. The reasons for this part of the judgment are as follows: (a) the part of the judgment of the court of the first instance, excluding the parts used or added as follows, i.e., from 7th to 14th 14th of the judgment of the court of the first instance, i.e., “3. judgment” is the same as the part of the judgment

Part VII of the judgment of the first instance shall begin with the 11th day.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.08 2016나69118

-제주지방법원 2021.02.02 2020나10671

-서울고등법원 2017.08.30 2017나2011528

-대구지방법원 2017.01.19 2016나308485

-대구고등법원 2018.11.22 2017나25742