The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who uses Twitter accounts D.

No person shall defame a candidate, his/her spouse, lineal ascendant or descendant, or sibling by openly pointing out facts through a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communications, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or any other means, with the intention of having him/her elected or not to be elected for any candidate who participates in an election.

그럼에도 불구하고, (1) 피고인은 2014. 4. 22. 자신의 트위터 계정(D)에 “E 의원은 미개한 국민들 상대로 7선 의원을 했고 미개한 국민들 교통비 70원 아니냐 해놓고 욕먹으니 해명하겠다고 자기도 쓴다고〈학생용〉버스카드들과 ‘미개한 쇼’하던 전적이 있었는데 최후의 양심이 있다면 후보 자진사퇴하길. 7선했음 됐지.“라는 글을 게시하고, (2) 피고인은 2014. 4. 23. 같은 방법으로 “몽심지심 국민미개 시체팔이 시장후보와 논객 직함,, 새민련 야당은 F정당에 E 후보사퇴를 촉구해야 한다”라는 글을 게시하고, (3) 피고인은 2014. 5. 9. 23:35경 같은 방법으로 “E 부인 선거법 위반ㅋㅋㅋㄱㅋㅋㅋㅋ몽가루 집안이�ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 온가족이 E안티라�ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ”라는 글을 게시하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant slandered the candidates, their spouses, or lineal ascendants and descendants by openly pointing out facts with a view to preventing them from winning the E candidates in total three times in total.

2. Determination

A. As to whether there was a purpose of preventing the Defendant from winning an election, “the purpose of getting a candidate or getting a candidate to be or not to be elected” as stated in the crime of aiding and abetting candidates under the main sentence of Article 251 of the Public Official Election Act is sufficient if there is insufficient perceptions that do not require active or conclusive perceptions, and whether there was such purpose or purpose is a social status of the Defendant, a candidate, or a candidate for competition.