1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On December 4, 1986, the Plaintiff acquired a new private taxi license in Yang-gu and operated a private taxi, and reported a criminal who escaped after a traffic accident on January 22, 1990 and November 7, 1991.

On December 7, 1991, the Plaintiff filed an application for changing the private taxi business area to Switzerland on the ground that the above crime reporting leads to the threat of the body.

On December 10, 1991, the defendant was transferred from the Yang-gu-gun to the plaintiff's application for a special license for the plaintiff's private taxi transport business, but determined that the plaintiff was not in the state of being threatened with the above crime report.

Accordingly, on January 27, 1992, the defendant issued a disposition rejecting the issuance of a license for a private taxi transport business (hereinafter "the disposition of this case") against the plaintiff.

On May 30, 1992, the Plaintiff obtained a private taxi license from the Defendant in accordance with the transfer procedure for private taxi transportation business.

After that, the Plaintiff reported a vehicle that escaped after a traffic accident on December 29, 2009 while running a private taxi transport business in Chuncheon City, and intended to move the vehicle to another Si/Gun for personal protection.

However, the plaintiff became aware that he/she could not move to another Si/Gun in the case of his/her personal taxi license granted by Chuncheon City.

After that, on April 11, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal seeking revocation of the instant disposition, and the Gangwon-do Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on June 12, 2017.

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit and the overall purport of the argument by the parties to the instant lawsuit, including the Plaintiff’s written evidence Nos. 5, 9, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21, and 22, and the overall purport of the pleading, may file an application to discontinue the Plaintiff’s private taxi license with both-gu-gun and issue the Plaintiff a special taxi transport business license under the relevant statutes, such as the Enforcement Rule of the Automobile Transport Business Act, but the instant disposition was