The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the instant case pertains to the Plaintiff’s filing of an appeal seeking revocation of the disposition rejecting a license application for taxi transport business on the ground that the Plaintiff’s rejection of the Plaintiff’s license for private taxi transport business constitutes a licensed owner for private taxi transport business in 2012 is deemed to deviate from the scope of discretionary authority or

The judgment of the first instance dismissed the plaintiff's claim on the ground that the plaintiff's driver's career does not correspond to the licensee's license holder as a result of calculating the plaintiff's driver's career according to the criteria for selection of the driver's license holder.

[Attachment of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes]

B. On the premise, 【Evidence 【The purport of Evidence 1-1, 2, 2, 9, and all pleadings (i) The Plaintiff is a person driving a business taxi since around 1998, and the Defendant is an administrative agency delegated by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport with the authority to grant a license for a private taxi transport business (private taxi transport business of the first person) under Article 4 of the Passenger Transport Service Act and Article 18 of the Enforcement Rule of the Passenger Transport Service Act.

⑵ 원고의 개인택시 운송사업면허 신청과 피고의 거부처분 ㈎ 원고는 피고가 2012. 12. 31.자로 당면한 개인택시 운송수요를 충족하기 위하여 개인택시의 증차를 결정하고 이에 따라 한 2012년도 개인택시 운송사업면허 신청자 모집공고에 대하여 피고에게 개인택시 운송사업 면허를 신청하여 수리되었다.

㈏ 피고는 2013. 4. 1. 인천광역시 개인택시 운송사업면허 사무처리 규칙에 정해진 바에 따라 조사한 결과에 기초하여 면허의 허부를 결정하기 위하여 2012년도 개인택시 운송사업면허 신청자의 운전경력 산정결과와 면허 대상자 예상경력을 공고하면서 원고의 운전경력을 다음과 같이...