A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2015, the Defendant, while gambling at a private horse site, was crackdownd on the gambling, followed by gambling power, and the Defendant was willing to make a statement as if the Defendant was a punishment for aggravated punishment.

1. On July 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written statement to the effect that he/she gambling at the E mountainous conference office located in Suwon-si D and the second floor of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and that he/she gambling at the private horse site; and (b) written C, the name of the Defendant’s punishment, which is the name of the Defendant, and submitted it to the police officer, with his/her seal affixed thereto.

Accordingly, the defendant, with the aim of uttering, forged or used private documents on fact verification.

2. On August 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) conducted an investigation into the police station in the South-gu, South-gu, Gyeonggi-do, 52 at the 52-ro, Young-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and an intelligence 1 team office, and conducted an investigation into the foregoing case; (b) signed the Defendant’s name in the suspect examination protocol, and presented it to the police officer in charge.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of a copy of the written statement, or a copy of the suspect examination protocol;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document, the choice of imprisonment), Articles 234, 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the aforementioned investigation document, the choice of imprisonment), Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of signing the private signature), Article 239 (2) and 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation signature);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is as follows: (a) when the defendant was found imminent, it is not good that the defendant prepared a written statement in the name of C as if he/she was sentenced to imprisonment C, and the signature of C in the suspect interrogation protocol is used by police officers.

However, the defendant.