logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.29 2019노3713
강제추행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) is that the defendant commits an indecent act against the victim as stated in the judgment below.

2. The judgment of the court below also asserted the same purport as this part of the grounds for appeal, but the court below rejected the judgment on the following grounds: (i) the victim specifically stated the content of damage as indicated in the judgment; and (ii) the defendant's negligence

In addition, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of misconception of facts as alleged by the defendant in the judgment below.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

The victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, has made a detailed statement to the extent that it is difficult for a person who has not actually experienced the indecent act committed by the victim from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the method of the indecent act, the situation after the indecent act, and the circumstances leading to the appraisal and reporting, etc., and consistently stated most matters, and it is difficult to find any part inconsistent with the facts which are inconsistent with or revealed in the records

Although the Defendant made a statement to the effect that the victim could have implicated another person and the Defendant, the victim made a detailed statement about the offender’s appearance immediately after the instant case, it is difficult to see that the Defendant was flicked with another person because it is the same as the Defendant’s appearance revealed in CCTV.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow