The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. 항소이유의 요지(사실오인) 목격자들이 “이 사건 범행 직후 범인이 자동차가 세워져 있던 건물 안으로 들어갔다”고 하면서 범인의 인상착의에 대하여 “키가 173~175cm 정도로 뚱뚱하고 배가 볼록한 체형이고 짧은 스포츠 머리에 머리카락이 뾰족이 서 있는 스타일”이라고 진술하고 있는 바 피고인의 주거지가 위 건물 내에 있고 범인의 인상착의가 피고인의 인상착의와 일치하고 있으며 위 건물에 거주하는 사람 중 범인의 인상착의와 비슷한 사람은 피고인이 유일한 점, 목격자들은 평소 피고인과 안면이 있었던 점 등에 비추어 보면, 경찰관이 목격자들에게 범인식별절차를 준수하지 않았다

Even if considering the fact that the statement of an witness who designated the defendant as an offender can be reliable, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, although it could sufficiently be recognized that the defendant committed the crime of this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Reviewing the reasoning of the judgment of the court below with the record and closely, the court below is justified in finding the defendant not guilty on the ground that the facts charged in this case constitutes a case where there is no proof of a crime, and it does not seem that there was an error of mistake of facts as alleged by the prosecutor.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.