logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.10.08 2014고정272
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around August 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 17:45, the Defendant: (b) sustained the victim’s chest who reported a high oral statement while booming the victim E and Sicul within “D” operated by the Defendant, the Defendant: (c) inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a plebal and chrogate, a fluoral coordinate, a fluoral coordinate, a fluoral coordinate, a fluoral coordinate, a fluoral coordinate, a fluoral coordinate, and a fluoral coordinate, etc., which require treatment for 21 days by plucking or digging up the victim’s chest who reported a high verbal statement.

2. The Defendant consistently asserts that there has been no injury to the victim’s chest since the investigative agency up to this court.

There are written statements of the victim, interrogation of the victim's suspect, and written diagnosis of injury that correspond to the facts charged in this case.

In the written statement, the victim made a statement that "the defendant was pushed about his chest four times," and in the police investigation, the victim made a statement that "the defendant tried to do so by her own hand, but he was a civilian figure on the chests only once he was frighted." In addition, the victim's statement is difficult to believe the victim's statement in light of the situation that he did not comply with the request of an investigative agency for a mass investigation, and the victim did not comply with the demand of a witness through several times in this court, and the victim's statement is not sufficient to conclude that the victim's statement was caused by the act of the defendant in the course of assaulting the defendant and interfering with his business. The other evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

3. In conclusion, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the

arrow