1. The plaintiff F, K, L, Q, and R shall be dismissed respectively.

2. The defendant shall attach attached Form 1 to the plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, G, H, J, S, N,O, and P.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 25, 2004, the development plan was approved, which was designated as a V urban development zone under the Urban Development Act (hereinafter “instant development zone,” and the development project of the instant development zone was designated as the executor of the instant development project, and the Defendant was designated as the executor of the instant development project.

On January 15, 2004, the date of announcement for public inspection of residents to designate the development zone of this case as an urban development zone is January 15, 2004.

B. On October 19, 2004, the Defendant publicly announced the relocation measures for the instant development project on November 20, 2002 (or August 20, 2002, a single tenant, a three-month period prior to the base date) on the base date for relocation measures.

C. On the other hand, the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government W Manx 152,813.6 square meters was designated as a place of development reservation, and was incorporated into the instant development zone only on October 8, 2007.

A district compensation plan shall be publicly announced on June 24, 2004 on March 29, 2005 and March 3-1, 2005 on February 3-2, 2006 and December 30, 2005 among the districts of 3-2 districts on December 30, 2005, X 152,813.6§³ on October 18, 2007.

The Defendant publicly announced a compensation plan under relevant statutes, such as the former Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works (amended by Act No. 8665, Oct. 17, 2007; hereinafter “former Public Works Act”) for each district of the instant development zone as indicated below.

E. The Defendant decided to specially supply apartment buildings to be developed within the instant development zone (hereinafter “instant apartment buildings”) as part of the measures for relocation under the former Public Works Act, in which they lose their means of living due to the expropriation of their owned housing, etc. as a consequence of the incorporation into the instant development zone.

The sale price for the above special supply was determined as the same amount as the sale price for the apartment sold to the general public.

F. Accordingly, the defendant is the apartment of this case as stated in the attached Form 2 sale contract list with the buyers (hereinafter referred to as the "sellers of this case").